Peter Ganick

from n1-thus

10] tryst vacate motionless inertia mull pots nths serious feint reflex ontic sparrow agitprop whaling crux repartee cold planetary nostrum agonize preempt license roman treble yeses gnomon diremption silica mallet bog site alcove nor sediment apache settle asleep each giggle neither sift enamor convince raid enormous delay nitpick sammulgen waits dim spaces doggerel arco rarely caterwaul prizewinner sanctity oases throughput infraction elaborates denial preoccupy doorman sizing nifty stammers dacoit voices denoting usage robust ivory clock toweled moot scansion parsecs aghast mote scansion presume resume patter snipe arrow collection selfless numerous annual property compendium scenario gordian crucible opprobrium selector vais cipher ici halt sigmundo preen upwards engine release oval voiceover tiers deflect motto laissez affreux damage pepper studebaker link  metalism cozen numerous deluge foible concept onset voiced smattering ignoble radar igneous delight redo delphi ovation escargot mindlessness ancestral nominal conestoga vigilante mannerism liaison prudence scimitar assertive milling noar snore apse reisling otherwise wavy crump tellurium grandee slat happiness wakeful tensionally.

'each page is an entire thought. each though is formed like a mosaic or a mobile. referential or non-referential?----i dont know. can the two be separated cleanly?.
thought is a type of music. music and thought must have a relationhip. each word on a page is as a word or unit from a mosaic/mobile/musical composition. are these words, and they are clearly words used in n1-thus, more-than-they-appear? or are they self-referential scribbles?

Peter Ganick

 peter ganick lives in west hartford ct with his wife carol. he is a piano instructor in his day-gig, and has been the publisher of many enterprises. he has published over 200 books of his writing. he still doesnt know.